public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	Adithya Jayachandran <ajayachandra@nvidia.com>,
	Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>, William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>,
	Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>,
	Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
	Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
	YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] iommu: Implement device and IOMMU HW preservation
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 10:07:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3874a086-98ae-4b94-8c1b-20e13f5a92fb@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427175633.1978233-5-skhawaja@google.com>

On 4/28/26 01:56, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> Add IOMMU ops to preserve/unpreserve a device. These can be implemented
> by the IOMMU drivers that support preservation of devices that have
> their IOMMU domains preserved. During device preservation the state of
> the associated IOMMU is also preserved as dependency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja<skhawaja@google.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/liveupdate.c       | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/iommu-liveupdate.h |  33 +++++++
>   include/linux/iommu.h            |  20 ++++
>   3 files changed, 215 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/liveupdate.c b/drivers/iommu/liveupdate.c
> index f71f14518248..765d042e22e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/liveupdate.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/liveupdate.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>   #include <linux/liveupdate.h>
>   #include <linux/iommu-liveupdate.h>
>   #include <linux/iommu.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>   #include <linux/errno.h>
>   
>   #define iommu_max_objs_per_page(_array) \
> @@ -293,3 +294,164 @@ void iommu_domain_unpreserve(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   	domain->preserved_state = NULL;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_domain_unpreserve);
> +
> +static struct iommu_hw_ser *alloc_iommu_hw_ser(struct iommu_flb_obj *flb)
> +{
> +	int idx;
> +
> +	idx = alloc_object_ser((struct iommu_array_hdr_ser **)&flb->curr_iommu_array,
> +			       iommu_max_objs_per_page(flb->curr_iommu_array));
> +	if (idx < 0)
> +		return ERR_PTR(idx);
> +
> +	flb->curr_iommu_array->objects[idx].hdr.ref_count = 1;
> +	return &flb->curr_iommu_array->objects[idx];
> +}
> +
> +static int iommu_preserve_locked(struct iommu_device *iommu,
> +				 struct iommu_flb_obj *flb_obj)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_hw_ser;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!iommu->ops->preserve)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&flb_obj->lock);
> +	if (iommu->outgoing_preserved_state) {
> +		iommu->outgoing_preserved_state->hdr.ref_count++;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	iommu_hw_ser = alloc_iommu_hw_ser(flb_obj);
> +	if (IS_ERR(iommu_hw_ser))
> +		return PTR_ERR(iommu_hw_ser);
> +
> +	ret = iommu->ops->preserve(iommu, iommu_hw_ser);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		iommu_hw_ser->hdr.deleted = true;
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	iommu->outgoing_preserved_state = iommu_hw_ser;
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void iommu_unpreserve_locked(struct iommu_device *iommu,
> +				    struct iommu_flb_obj *flb_obj)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_hw_ser = iommu->outgoing_preserved_state;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&flb_obj->lock);
> +	iommu_hw_ser->hdr.ref_count--;
> +	if (iommu_hw_ser->hdr.ref_count)
> +		return;
> +
> +	iommu->outgoing_preserved_state = NULL;
> +	iommu->ops->unpreserve(iommu, iommu_hw_ser);
> +	iommu_hw_ser->hdr.deleted = true;
> +}
> +
> +static struct iommu_device_ser *alloc_iommu_device_ser(struct iommu_flb_obj *flb)
> +{
> +	int idx;
> +
> +	idx = alloc_object_ser((struct iommu_array_hdr_ser **)&flb->curr_device_array,
> +			       iommu_max_objs_per_page(flb->curr_device_array));
> +	if (idx < 0)
> +		return ERR_PTR(idx);
> +
> +	flb->curr_device_array->objects[idx].hdr.ref_count = 1;
> +	return &flb->curr_device_array->objects[idx];
> +}
> +
> +int iommu_preserve_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +			  struct device *dev, u64 *preserved_state)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_flb_obj *flb_obj;
> +	struct iommu_device_ser *device_ser;
> +	struct dev_iommu *iommu;
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (!domain->preserved_state)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!iommu_group_dma_owner_claimed(dev->iommu_group))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	iommu = dev->iommu;
> +	if (!iommu->iommu_dev->ops->preserve_device ||
> +	    !iommu->iommu_dev->ops->preserve)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	ret = liveupdate_flb_get_outgoing(&iommu_flb, (void **)&flb_obj);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	guard(mutex)(&flb_obj->lock);
> +	device_ser = alloc_iommu_device_ser(flb_obj);
> +	if (IS_ERR(device_ser))
> +		return PTR_ERR(device_ser);
> +
> +	ret = iommu_preserve_locked(iommu->iommu_dev, flb_obj);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		device_ser->hdr.deleted = true;
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.domain_phys = __pa(domain->preserved_state);
> +	device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.iommu_phys = __pa(iommu->iommu_dev->outgoing_preserved_state);
> +	device_ser->devid = pci_dev_id(pdev);
> +	device_ser->pci_domain_nr = pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus);
> +
> +	ret = iommu->iommu_dev->ops->preserve_device(dev, device_ser);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		device_ser->hdr.deleted = true;
> +		iommu_unpreserve_locked(iommu->iommu_dev, flb_obj);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev->iommu->device_ser = device_ser;
> +	*preserved_state = virt_to_phys(device_ser);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void iommu_unpreserve_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_flb_obj *flb_obj;
> +	struct iommu_device_ser *iommu_device_ser;
> +	struct dev_iommu *iommu;
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!iommu_group_dma_owner_claimed(dev->iommu_group))
> +		return;
> +
> +	pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +	iommu = dev->iommu;
> +	if (!iommu->iommu_dev->ops->unpreserve_device ||
> +	    !iommu->iommu_dev->ops->unpreserve)
> +		return;

Is it considered a driver bug if it implements the preserve hooks but
not unpreserve ones? This would at least cause a silent memory leak. How
about adding a WARN like this?

     if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!iommu->iommu_dev->ops->unpreserve_device ||
                      !iommu->iommu_dev->ops->unpreserve))
         return;

?

Thanks,
baolu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-07  2:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-27 17:56 [PATCH v2 00/16] iommu: Add live update state preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] liveupdate: luo_file: Add internal APIs for file preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] iommu: Implement IOMMU Live update FLB callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-01 21:45   ` David Matlack
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] iommu: Implement IOMMU domain preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-01 22:08   ` David Matlack
2026-05-04 18:33     ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] iommu: Implement device and IOMMU HW preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-01 22:42   ` David Matlack
2026-05-04 19:06     ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-07  2:07   ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] iommu/pages: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve/restore iommu pages Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] iommupt: Implement preserve/unpreserve/restore callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-07  2:55   ` Baolu Lu
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] iommu/vt-d: Implement device and iommu preserve/unpreserve ops Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] iommu: Add APIs to get iommu and device preserved state Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] iommu/vt-d: Restore IOMMU state and reclaimed domain ids Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] iommu: Restore and reattach preserved domains to devices Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] iommu/vt-d: preserve PASID table of preserved device Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] iommufd: Implement ioctl to mark HWPT for preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] iommufd: Persist iommu hardware pagetables for live update Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] iommufd: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve a vfio cdev Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] vfio/pci: Preserve the iommufd state of the " Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] iommufd/selftest: Add test to verify iommufd preservation Samiullah Khawaja

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3874a086-98ae-4b94-8c1b-20e13f5a92fb@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ajayachandra@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=vipinsh@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=witu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhuyifei@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox