From: "Feng Wang" <yeti-fOMaevN1BEbsJZF79Ady7g@public.gmane.org>
To: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: So strange, time becomes skew when VM is running
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:55:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <393046937.11701@ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1593 bytes --]
When I started up two KVM VMs upon SLES 10 OS based on a multi-core hardware
platform and ran some computing-intensive tasks (e.g. SPECjbb2005) within each VM,
I found that something confusing me very much.
The VM which is first started is running as well as it runs without other VMs, but
the system time of the subsequent started one is skew. E.g. VM1 and VM2 are both
started at 10:00am, and then I execute the same one computing-intensive task in
each VM at nearly same time, i.e. 10:15am. Then you will see that the execution of
task in VM2 is much slowly than VM1 (There are enough computing resource for VMs,
e.g. the hardware platform have 8 CPUs, and each VM is configured by supporting 1
CPUs). When the task in VM1 is finished, the system times of VM1 and Host are both
10:30am, this means the execution of task needs nearly 15 minutes. But when the
task in VM2 is finished, the system time of Host is 10:40am, the system time of
VM2 is 10:30am, so the system time of VM2 is slower than the Host's. Why?
Additionally, I found that the CPU¡¯s ¡°bogomips¡± feature listed in /proc/cpuinfo
of each VM is different. I guess this maybe results from the CPU emulation of QEMU
because I found the similar phenomenon when I used KVM VM with the ¡°-no-kvm¡±
option. I don¡¯t know if this is the reason for the problems described above, but
according to my experiment results I found that the bogomips feature has few
relations with the execution performance of VM.
I don¡¯t know if this can demonstrate the performance conflict between two VMs, so
I need your help. Thank you very much.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 314 bytes --]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
next reply other threads:[~2007-10-22 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-22 9:55 Feng Wang [this message]
[not found] ` <393046937.11701-pcTkQGq1WEvM1kAEIRd3EQ@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-22 9:59 ` So strange, time becomes skew when VM is running Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=393046937.11701@ustc.edu.cn \
--to=yeti-fomaevn1bebsjzf79ady7g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox