public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nikolai K. Bochev" <n.bochev@grandstarco.com>
To: Neil Aggarwal <neil@JAMMConsulting.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using snmpd on host to monitor guest bandwidth usage
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:49:45 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <398166133.4521256413785803.JavaMail.root@yellowwing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7BDC24FC8AF44ED7A967171E355E6813@neilhp>

Hello,

As far as i know, you can fix the vm's interfaces on the host. I'm using libvirt and you can do it there as described in here :

http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsNICSBridge ( What you're looking for is <target dev='vnet0'/> directive ).

If you don't do this, vnet interfaces will be assigned to vm's in the order they start - the first one getting vnet0, the second one vnet1 etc.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Aggarwal" <neil@JAMMConsulting.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 4:52:59 PM
Subject: Using snmpd on host to monitor guest bandwidth usage

Hello:

I am using Cacti to monitor traffic usage on my network.

According to what I am reading, snmpd can report traffic
stats to Cacti.

Running netstat -in on the host, I see this output:

Kernel Interface table
Iface       MTU Met    RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR    TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP
TX-OVR Flg
br0        1500   0   237609      0      0      0    13615      0      0
0 BMRU
eth0       1500   0   967594      0      0      0   354576      0      0
0 BMRU
lo        16436   0       63      0      0      0       63      0      0
0 LRU
virbr0     1500   0        0      0      0      0       32      0      0
0 BMRU
vnet0      1500   0    29802      0      0      0   306940      0      0
0 BMRU
vnet1      1500   0   311556      0      0      0   789331      0      0
0 BMRU

Each guest runs a bridge interface with a static IP address.
Looking at the firewall logs vnet1 is connected to guestA and
vnet0 is connected to guestB.  Will that ever change if I reboot
the host or the guests?  If it does, that would be a problem.

Are there any pitfalls of using this approach?

I am looking for a solution where I do not need to run anything
on the guests.

Thanks,
	Neil

--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, www.JAMMConsulting.com
Will your e-commerce site go offline if you have
a DB server failure, fiber cut, flood, fire, or other disaster?
If so, ask about our geographically redundant database system.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-24 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-24 13:52 Using snmpd on host to monitor guest bandwidth usage Neil Aggarwal
2009-10-24 19:49 ` Nikolai K. Bochev [this message]
2009-10-25  0:23   ` Neil Aggarwal
2009-10-25  5:46     ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-25  7:02       ` Nikolai K. Bochev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=398166133.4521256413785803.JavaMail.root@yellowwing \
    --to=n.bochev@grandstarco.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@JAMMConsulting.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox