From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
"hao_zhang_kdev@163.com" <hao_zhang_kdev@163.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: x86: ioapic: Update remote_irr only after successful delivery
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 11:11:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b3db5de497f6196ddc17558b71aa746b0adf1e7.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anrQfoE8HRvsaao_@192.168.1.215>
On Tue, 2026-08-11 at 15:34 +0800, Hao Zhang wrote:
> From: Hao Zhang <zhanghao1@kylinos.cn>
>
> The I/O APIC sets remote_irr for level-triggered interrupts that have
> been accepted by a local APIC and are waiting for an EOI.
>
> ioapic_service() currently treats any non-zero return from
> kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic() as successful delivery. But
> kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic() returns -1 when no destination is found.
> Setting remote_irr for that failed delivery leaves the pin blocked
> forever waiting for an EOI that will never be generated.
>
> Update remote_irr only when the delivery result is positive, i.e. when
> at least one local APIC accepted the interrupt.
>
> Fixes: 4925663a079c ("KVM: Report IRQ injection status to userspace.")
The code LGTM, but I am not sure this is the right commit for the Fixes tag.
Looking at the relevant diff:
+static int ioapic_service(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, unsigned int idx)
{
union ioapic_redir_entry *pent;
+ int injected = -1;
pent = &ioapic->redirtbl[idx];
if (!pent->fields.mask) {
- int injected = ioapic_deliver(ioapic, idx);
+ injected = ioapic_deliver(ioapic, idx);
if (injected && pent->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG)
pent->fields.remote_irr = 1;
}
This commit didn't change any logic related to remote_irr, since it didn't touch
ioapic_deliver() at all.
The one that is close seems to be
ff4b9df877b30 ("KVM: IOAPIC: only set remote_irr if interrupt was injected")
since it actually touched the logic of when to set remote_irr:
@@ -89,8 +89,8 @@ static void ioapic_service(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, unsigned
int idx)
pent = &ioapic->redirtbl[idx];
if (!pent->fields.mask) {
- ioapic_deliver(ioapic, idx);
- if (pent->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG)
+ int injected = ioapic_deliver(ioapic, idx);
+ if (injected && pent->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG)
pent->fields.remote_irr = 1;
}
But looking closer, at that time the ioapic_deliver() could only return 0 or 1
(or >1 I didn't check), i.e., it couldn't return -1 at all.
In fact, even when commit 4925663a079c was merged the then ioapic_deliver()
couldn't return -1.
So AFAICT both of the above two commits are not the right one.
I haven't found which one to blame, but it seems at some point the function
kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic() was introduced and at some other point it was changed
to be able to return -1. But I didn't dig further.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 7:34 [PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: x86: ioapic: Update remote_irr only after successful delivery Hao Zhang
2026-08-11 7:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] KVM: selftests: Verify failed IOAPIC delivery preserves state Hao Zhang
2026-08-11 7:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] KVM: x86: ioapic: Preserve irr_delivered for duplicate edge interrupts Hao Zhang
2026-08-11 11:27 ` Huang, Kai
2026-08-11 7:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] KVM: x86: ioapic: Clear irr_delivered on level-triggered RTE Hao Zhang
2026-08-11 11:43 ` Huang, Kai
2026-08-11 11:11 ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2026-08-11 23:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: x86: ioapic: Update remote_irr only after successful delivery Huang, Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b3db5de497f6196ddc17558b71aa746b0adf1e7.camel@intel.com \
--to=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=hao_zhang_kdev@163.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).