From: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
To: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: alexandru.elisei@arm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
shahuang@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 13/18] arm64: Simplify efi_mem_init
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:10:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d0cb559-87dc-423f-9461-574e810fbdb2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227192109.487402-33-andrew.jones@linux.dev>
On 27/02/2024 19:21, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Reduce the EFI mem_map loop to only setting flags and finding the
> largest free memory region. Then, apply memregions_split() for
> the code/data region split and do the rest of the things that
> used to be done in the EFI mem_map loop in a separate mem_region
> loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Thanks,
Nikos
> ---
> lib/arm/setup.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/arm/setup.c b/lib/arm/setup.c
> index d0be4c437708..631597b343f1 100644
> --- a/lib/arm/setup.c
> +++ b/lib/arm/setup.c
> @@ -301,9 +301,7 @@ static efi_status_t efi_mem_init(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
> struct efi_boot_memmap *map = &(efi_bootinfo->mem_map);
> efi_memory_desc_t *buffer = *map->map;
> efi_memory_desc_t *d = NULL;
> - struct mem_region r;
> - uintptr_t text = (uintptr_t)&_text, etext = ALIGN((uintptr_t)&_etext, 4096);
> - uintptr_t data = (uintptr_t)&_data, edata = ALIGN((uintptr_t)&_edata, 4096);
> + struct mem_region r, *code, *data;
> const void *fdt = efi_bootinfo->fdt;
>
> /*
> @@ -337,21 +335,7 @@ static efi_status_t efi_mem_init(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
> r.flags = MR_F_IO;
> break;
> case EFI_LOADER_CODE:
> - if (r.start <= text && r.end > text) {
> - /* This is the unit test region. Flag the code separately. */
> - phys_addr_t tmp = r.end;
> -
> - assert(etext <= data);
> - assert(edata <= r.end);
> - r.flags = MR_F_CODE;
> - r.end = data;
> - memregions_add(&r);
> - r.start = data;
> - r.end = tmp;
> - r.flags = 0;
> - } else {
> - r.flags = MR_F_RESERVED;
> - }
> + r.flags = MR_F_CODE;
> break;
> case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY:
> if (free_mem_pages < d->num_pages) {
> @@ -361,15 +345,27 @@ static efi_status_t efi_mem_init(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
> break;
> }
>
> - if (!(r.flags & MR_F_IO)) {
> - if (r.start < __phys_offset)
> - __phys_offset = r.start;
> - if (r.end > __phys_end)
> - __phys_end = r.end;
> - }
> memregions_add(&r);
> }
>
> + memregions_split((unsigned long)&_etext, &code, &data);
> + assert(code && (code->flags & MR_F_CODE));
> + if (data)
> + data->flags &= ~MR_F_CODE;
> +
> + for (struct mem_region *m = mem_regions; m->end; ++m) {
> + if (m != code && (m->flags & MR_F_CODE))
> + m->flags = MR_F_RESERVED;
> +
> + if (!(m->flags & MR_F_IO)) {
> + if (m->start < __phys_offset)
> + __phys_offset = m->start;
> + if (m->end > __phys_end)
> + __phys_end = m->end;
> + }
> + }
> + __phys_end &= PHYS_MASK;
> +
> if (efi_bootinfo->fdt_valid) {
> unsigned long old_start = free_mem_start;
> void *freemem = (void *)free_mem_start;
> @@ -380,7 +376,6 @@ static efi_status_t efi_mem_init(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
> free_mem_pages = (free_mem_start - old_start) >> EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
>
> - __phys_end &= PHYS_MASK;
> asm_mmu_disable();
>
> if (free_mem_pages == 0)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-04 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 19:21 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 00/18] arm64: EFI improvements Andrew Jones
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 01/18] runtime: Update MAX_SMP probe Andrew Jones
2024-03-03 21:43 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 02/18] runtime: Add yet another 'no kernel' error message Andrew Jones
2024-03-03 21:50 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 03/18] arm64: efi: Don't create dummy test Andrew Jones
2024-03-03 21:57 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 04/18] arm64: efi: Make running tests on EFI can be parallel Andrew Jones
2024-03-03 22:06 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 05/18] arm64: efi: Remove redundant dtb generation Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:16 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 06/18] arm64: efi: Move run code into a function Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:19 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 07/18] arm64: efi: Remove EFI_USE_DTB Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:20 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 08/18] arm64: efi: Improve device tree discovery Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:34 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-03-04 9:35 ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 09/18] lib/efi: Add support for loading the initrd Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:44 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 10/18] arm64: efi: Allow running tests directly Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:52 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-03-04 9:43 ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 11/18] arm/arm64: Factor out some initial setup Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 7:59 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 12/18] arm/arm64: Factor out allocator init from mem_init Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 8:01 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 13/18] arm64: Simplify efi_mem_init Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 8:10 ` Nikos Nikoleris [this message]
2024-03-04 9:55 ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 10:01 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 14/18] arm64: Add memregions_efi_init Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 8:16 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 15/18] arm64: efi: Don't map reserved regions Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 8:18 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 16/18] arm64: efi: Fix _start returns from failed _relocate Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 8:58 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 17/18] arm64: efi: Switch to our own stack Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 9:03 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2024-02-27 19:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 18/18] arm64: efi: Add gitlab CI Andrew Jones
2024-03-04 9:06 ` Nikos Nikoleris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d0cb559-87dc-423f-9461-574e810fbdb2@arm.com \
--to=nikos.nikoleris@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox