From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/7] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:07:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <400dc0d2-86bc-cdc8-ec8a-7d1148ebd5fa@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e85ec92-4d0a-f673-00c8-a9ab9a22118c@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2244 bytes --]
On 1/16/20 1:24 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.01.20 13:05, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> All CRs are set to 0 and CRs 0 and 14 are set to pre-defined values,
>> so we also need to test 1-13 and 15 for 0.
>>
>> And while we're at it, let's also set some values to cr 1, 7 and 13, so
>> we can actually be sure that they will be zeroed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> s390x/smp.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
>> index d430638..ce3215d 100644
>> --- a/s390x/smp.c
>> +++ b/s390x/smp.c
>> @@ -176,16 +176,31 @@ static void test_emcall(void)
>> report_prefix_pop();
>> }
>>
>> +/* Used to dirty registers of cpu #1 before it is reset */
>> +static void test_func_initial(void)
>> +{
>> + lctlg(1, 0x42000UL);
>> + lctlg(7, 0x43000UL);
>> + lctlg(13, 0x44000UL);
>> + testflag = 1;
>> + mb();
>> + cpu_loop();
>
> Can we make cpu_loop() the default when this function returns? (IOW, an
> endless loop whenever a cpu finished executing the function?)
So adding it to cstart64.S after the br 14?
>
> Do we need the mb() here?
Would the compiler reorder the lctlcg and testflag if it could?
>
>> +}
>> +
>> static void test_reset_initial(void)
>> {
>> struct cpu_status *status = alloc_pages(0);
>> + uint64_t nullp[12] = {};
>> struct psw psw;
>>
>> psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
>> - psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
>> + psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func_initial;
>>
>> report_prefix_push("reset initial");
>> + testflag = 0;
>> + mb();
>> smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
>> + wait_for_flag();
>>
>> sigp_retry(1, SIGP_INITIAL_CPU_RESET, 0, NULL);
>> sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_STATUS_AT_ADDRESS, (uintptr_t)status, NULL);
>> @@ -196,6 +211,8 @@ static void test_reset_initial(void)
>> report(!status->fpc, "fpc");
>> report(!status->cputm, "cpu timer");
>> report(!status->todpr, "todpr");
>> + report(!memcmp(&status->crs[1], nullp, sizeof(status->crs[1]) * 12), "cr1-13 == 0");
>> + report(status->crs[15] == 0, "cr15 == 0");
>> report_prefix_pop();
>>
>> report_prefix_push("initialized");
>>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-16 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 12:05 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/7] s390x: smp: Improve smp code and reset checks Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/7] s390x: smp: Cleanup smp.c Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:01 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/7] s390x: smp: Only use smp_cpu_setup once Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:01 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/7] s390x: Add cpu id to interrupt error prints Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:04 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 13:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 14:11 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/7] s390x: smp: Rework cpu start and active tracking Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 14:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 14:44 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 15:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/7] s390x: smp: Wait for cpu setup to finish Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/7] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset Janosch Frank
2020-01-16 12:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 13:07 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-01-16 13:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-16 12:05 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 7/7] s390x: smp: Dirty fpc before initial reset test Janosch Frank
2020-01-17 10:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-17 10:29 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-17 10:41 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=400dc0d2-86bc-cdc8-ec8a-7d1148ebd5fa@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox