From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] check multiple init for vm/smp Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:00:24 +0200 Message-ID: <42eedbd6-a7c3-71bd-ccd9-3b794b05ae31@redhat.com> References: <1477386030-13955-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <20161025101247.t2v6td4rwex7ipj3@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> <20161025115647.GB13839@pxdev.xzpeter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com To: Peter Xu , Andrew Jones Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58460 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752973AbcJYQAb (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:00:31 -0400 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7CA36331E for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:00:29 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <20161025115647.GB13839@pxdev.xzpeter.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 25/10/2016 13:56, Peter Xu wrote: > > For this series: I have no strong willingness to push this in, and yes > all three patches are not essential at all. I just picked them out > from vt-d unit test series, in case any of us would like to pick it. I applied patch 1. Paolo