From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/5] s390x: uv-host: Add attestation test
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 09:18:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43eac0fb-4635-1e19-90ce-38386aa5b216@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220222145456.9956-2-seiden@linux.ibm.com>
On 2/22/22 15:54, Steffen Eiden wrote:
> Adds an invalid command test for attestation in the uv-host.
I'm still fine with this test but I'd suggest changing the title to:
s390x: uv-host: Add invalid command attestation check
Just so it doesn't sound the same as the last patch in the series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/asm/uv.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> s390x/uv-host.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
> index 70bf65c4..c330c0f8 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> /*
> * s390x Ultravisor related definitions
> *
> - * Copyright (c) 2020 IBM Corp
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2020, 2022
> *
> * Authors:
> * Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
> #define UVC_CMD_UNPIN_PAGE_SHARED 0x0342
> #define UVC_CMD_SET_SHARED_ACCESS 0x1000
> #define UVC_CMD_REMOVE_SHARED_ACCESS 0x1001
> +#define UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION 0x1020
>
> /* Bits in installed uv calls */
> enum uv_cmds_inst {
> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ enum uv_cmds_inst {
> BIT_UVC_CMD_UNSHARE_ALL = 20,
> BIT_UVC_CMD_PIN_PAGE_SHARED = 21,
> BIT_UVC_CMD_UNPIN_PAGE_SHARED = 22,
> + BIT_UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION = 28,
> };
>
> struct uv_cb_header {
> @@ -178,6 +180,25 @@ struct uv_cb_cfs {
> u64 paddr;
> } __attribute__((packed)) __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>
> +/* Retrieve Attestation Measurement */
> +struct uv_cb_attest {
> + struct uv_cb_header header; /* 0x0000 */
> + uint64_t reserved08[2]; /* 0x0008 */
> + uint64_t arcb_addr; /* 0x0018 */
> + uint64_t continuation_token; /* 0x0020 */
> + uint8_t reserved28[6]; /* 0x0028 */
> + uint16_t user_data_length; /* 0x002e */
> + uint8_t user_data[256]; /* 0x0030 */
> + uint32_t reserved130[3]; /* 0x0130 */
> + uint32_t measurement_length; /* 0x013c */
> + uint64_t measurement_address; /* 0x0140 */
> + uint8_t config_uid[16]; /* 0x0148 */
> + uint32_t reserved158; /* 0x0158 */
> + uint32_t add_data_length; /* 0x015c */
> + uint64_t add_data_address; /* 0x0160 */
> + uint64_t reserved168[4]; /* 0x0168 */
> +} __attribute__((packed)) __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> +
> /* Set Secure Config Parameter */
> struct uv_cb_ssc {
> struct uv_cb_header header;
> diff --git a/s390x/uv-host.c b/s390x/uv-host.c
> index de2e4850..fe49d7b9 100644
> --- a/s390x/uv-host.c
> +++ b/s390x/uv-host.c
> @@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ static struct cmd_list invalid_cmds[] = {
> { "bogus", 0x4242, sizeof(struct uv_cb_header), -1},
> { "share", UVC_CMD_SET_SHARED_ACCESS, sizeof(struct uv_cb_share), BIT_UVC_CMD_SET_SHARED_ACCESS },
> { "unshare", UVC_CMD_REMOVE_SHARED_ACCESS, sizeof(struct uv_cb_share), BIT_UVC_CMD_REMOVE_SHARED_ACCESS },
> + { "attest", UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION, sizeof(struct uv_cb_attest), BIT_UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION },
> { NULL, 0, 0 },
> };
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-23 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-22 14:54 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/5] s390x: Attestation tests Steffen Eiden
2022-02-22 14:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/5] s390x: uv-host: Add attestation test Steffen Eiden
2022-03-23 8:18 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2022-02-22 14:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/5] s390x: lib: Add QUI getter Steffen Eiden
2022-02-23 15:37 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-03-23 8:07 ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-22 14:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/5] s390x: uv-guest: remove duplicated checks Steffen Eiden
2022-02-22 14:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/5] s390x: uv-guest: add share bit test Steffen Eiden
2022-02-23 15:36 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-03-23 8:16 ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-22 14:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/5] s390x: uv-guest: Add attestation tests Steffen Eiden
2022-02-23 15:48 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-03-23 8:39 ` Janosch Frank
2022-03-23 10:07 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43eac0fb-4635-1e19-90ce-38386aa5b216@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox