From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] KVM: x86 emulator Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:22:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4550889C.2020708@qumranet.com> References: <454E4941.7000108@qumranet.com> <20061105204035.DF0F62500A7@cleopatra.q> <20061107124912.GA23118@elf.ucw.cz> <4550823E.2070108@qumranet.com> <1162904459.3138.142.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, akpm-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Pavel Machek Return-path: To: Arjan van de Ven In-Reply-To: <1162904459.3138.142.camel-NIQFrBLA1CpScpXdPBN83iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> The entire patchset is GPL'ed. Do you mean to make it explicit? If so, >> how? I'd rather not copy the entire license into each file. >> > > a simple one liner like > "This file is licensed under the terms of the GPL v2 license" > (add "or later" if you feel like doing that) > is going to be generally useful. > > At least many many legal departments really prefer at least that minimum > line to be there for each file; some even want a much longer blurb. > Okay. I hate to use the word "official", but is there an official position on this somewhere? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642