From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Version control system for KVM? Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:48:13 +0200 Message-ID: <4559F34D.90700@qumranet.com> References: <87u01286uc.wl%simon.kagstrom@bth.se> <4559E604.9090909@qumranet.com> <20061114163651.GB6848@rhun.ibm.com> <4559F0E9.1050503@qumranet.com> <20061114164322.GC6848@rhun.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Return-path: To: Muli Ben-Yehuda In-Reply-To: <20061114164322.GC6848-k73YwwB0fHlWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 06:38:01PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > > >> subversion on sourceforge >> > > Eeek on both accounts... I strongly recommend git or mercurial at > least for the kernel bits. Also, if svn on sf is as bad as CVS used to > be there... you're in for a lot of pain. > > git's learning curve is too steep for me. I may dip into it later on, but I've got too much on my plate right now. Mercurial is fine, but I don't have hosting for it and I don't see the need for such a small project. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.net email is sponsored by: A Better Job is Waiting for You - Find it Now. Check out Slashdot's new job board. Browse through tons of technical jobs posted by companies looking to hire people just like you. http://jobs.slashdot.org/