Re: Versioning of KVM

Avi Kivity
2006-11-15T07:50:47Z

Baruch Even wrote:
> Avi,
>
> Can you please decide on a normal version number for KVM? I currently
> use 0.0.2 in order to be able to use later a proper version number, If
> I'd use 2 now than any other sane version later such as 1.0 will be
> lower and I'll have to use a prefix to fix that. It would be nice if you
> could just use normal version numbers from the start so the Debian
> version number will be the same as your version number.
>
>

Well, I'd have thought that the natural numbers are a perfectly sane
numbering scheme. However, I'll bow to tradition and the next release
will be 0.3.

> Some other issues I had with packaging were clean targets that are
> either missing or incomplete. You can take a look at the .diff.gz file
> that is in http://people.debian.org/~baruch/kvm/ to see all the changes
> I needed to do to the package to build it. It is rather messy right now
> but you might be able to get some things you can incorporate in order to
> make packaging easier.
>

My current tree has fixes for most of the problems. I'll look at the
clean targets (why are they necessary for packaging?)

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function