public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* KVM and/or Qemu ?
@ 2006-12-18 13:13 James Jacobsson
       [not found] ` <fe247b50612180513l68f1b2c5v66f6e82339026f5f-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: James Jacobsson @ 2006-12-18 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

Is KVM supposed to be a generic VT-x/SVM abstraction layer, or is it
supposed to be yet-another Qemu backend?

The reason I'm asking is that I'm a bit confused. When I'm looking at
the kernel module sources and the interface (kvmctl.h), it looks like
an VT-x/SVM abstraction layer, but when trying to build KVM, it
insists on compiling Qemu, as well as many of the data structures
seems very Qemu influenced.

If KVM isn't supposed to be for Qemu only, I'd like to start working
on getting a better separation between KVM and Qemu, as well as
documenting the KVM interface.

Best regards,
James

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-12-18 13:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-18 13:13 KVM and/or Qemu ? James Jacobsson
     [not found] ` <fe247b50612180513l68f1b2c5v66f6e82339026f5f-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2006-12-18 13:29   ` Avi Kivity

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox