From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] KVM updates for 2.6.20-rc2 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:28:03 +0200 Message-ID: <4593E283.5000006@qumranet.com> References: <20061228113038.GA16190@elte.hu> <4593B948.5090009@qumranet.com> <20061228133746.GC3392@elte.hu> <4593CB61.5050709@qumranet.com> <20061228135020.GA7606@elte.hu> <4593CD74.6060202@qumranet.com> <20061228140742.GA10033@elte.hu> <4593D243.1030301@qumranet.com> <20061228150104.GB16057@elte.hu> <4593DE1D.8010701@qumranet.com> <20061228151159.GA20279@elte.hu> <4593E1E3.2020800@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel Return-path: To: Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <4593E1E3.2020800-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Avi Kivity wrote: > > There's a documented error number, 5, for "VMRESUME with non-launched > vmcs". > > Furthermore, I checked, and it indeed doesn't work. > > btw, there is a large number of checks in the vmx spec, and I know of none which are not implemented. It seems Intel is (understandably) wary of software exploiting undocumented behavior, which would force them to support it in future processors to maintain compatibility. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV