From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/33] KVM: MMU: Cache shadow page tables Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:41:57 +0200 Message-ID: <459D3C65.2090703@qumranet.com> References: <459D21DD.5090506@qumranet.com> <20070104092226.91fa2dfe.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel , linux-kernel Return-path: To: Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20070104092226.91fa2dfe.akpm-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > Is this intended for 2.6.20, or would you prefer that we release what we > have now and hold this off for 2.6.21? > Even though these patches are potentially destabilazing, I'd like them (and a few other patches) to go into 2.6.20: - kvm did not exist in 2.6.19, hence we cannot regress from that - this patchset is the difference between a working proof of concept and a generally usable system - from my testing, it's quite stable -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV