Re: [PATCH 0/33] KVM: MMU: Cache shadow page tables

Avi Kivity
2007-01-04T17:41:57Z

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Is this intended for 2.6.20, or would you prefer that we release what we
> have now and hold this off for 2.6.21?
>

Even though these patches are potentially destabilazing, I'd like them
(and a few other patches) to go into 2.6.20:

- kvm did not exist in 2.6.19, hence we cannot regress from that
- this patchset is the difference between a working proof of concept and
a generally usable system
- from my testing, it's quite stable

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.