Re: kvm & dyntick

[Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>   
>>> dyntick-enabled guest:
>>> - reduce the load on the host when the guest is idling
>>>   (currently an idle guest consumes a few percent cpu)
>>>       
>> yeah. KVM under -rt already works with dynticks enabled on both the 
>> host and the guest. (but it's more optimal to use a dedicated 
>> hypercall to set the next guest-interrupt)
>>     
>
> using the dynticks code from the -rt kernel makes the overhead of an 
> idle guest go down by a factor of 10-15:
>
>   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
>  2556 mingo     15   0  598m 159m 157m R  1.5  8.0   0:26.20 qemu
>
>   

As usual, great news.

> ( for this to work on my system i have added a 'hyper' clocksource 
>   hypercall API for KVM guests to use - this is needed instead of the 
>   running-to-slowly TSC. )
>   

What's the problem with the TSC?  The only issue I'm aware of is that 
the tsc might go backwards if the vcpu is migrated to another host cpu 
(easily fixed).

A pv clocksource makes sense in any case.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV