From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Riepe Subject: Re: Now that 2.6.20 is out Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:49:25 +0100 Message-ID: <45D1EC15.5070308@mr511.de> References: <45C8A25C.8090701@mr511.de> <64F9B87B6B770947A9F8391472E032160A4D2745@ehost011-8.exch011.intermedia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel To: Dor Laor Return-path: In-Reply-To: <64F9B87B6B770947A9F8391472E032160A4D2745-yEcIvxbTEBqsx+V+t5oei8rau4O3wl8o3fe8/T/H7NteoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Hi! >>which is the right user-space release to use the built-in kvm? >> >>My tools from the trunk kill the Core Duo, probably due to an interface >>mismatch. > > > The KVM_API_VERSION in the kernel tree is 2 while the one in the trunk > is 3. > When have you updated your sources? Too often to remember the details, sorry. > I get the version mismatch msg. That's what I would have expected - my sources already included the v3 interface. > Are you sure the kernel's kvm modules are the one loaded? There weren't any other kvm modules in /lib/modules/2.6.20, so the answer is: "absolutely". kvm-12 works fine with 2.6.20, however, and I can still load another set of modules if I want a more recent version. -- Michael "Tired" Riepe X-Tired: Each morning I get up I die a little ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642