From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [RFC] QEMU KVM target -> Anthony Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:44:36 -0500 Message-ID: <45FD6C74.1090204@codemonkey.ws> References: <3810d4-k6b.ln1@tux.abusar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E2niel_Fraga?= Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3810d4-k6b.ln1-wHoKvyfhNRggb5+hjvvj3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org D=E2niel Fraga wrote: > Anthony, it has been almost a month since you announced your > patch to remove gcc3 dependency: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org/msg01386.html > > You promissed that you would change the code and submit it > again. > = I'm not entirely sure it's the right thing to do. The proper solution = is qops. I also don't think it's a good idea to merge things into KVM that = wouldn't be reasonable to integrate into upstream QEMU. I think this is = probably the case with this one. Regards, Anthony Liguori > I'm just a user but I can't wait to see this code merged, since > I just use gcc 4 and don't want to bother with gcc 3 details. > > Any news on that? > > Thank you very much! > > = ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DDE= VDEV