From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [RFC] QEMU KVM target -> Anthony Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:51:47 -0500 Message-ID: <45FD9853.6040907@codemonkey.ws> References: <3810d4-k6b.ln1@tux.abusar.org> <45FD6C74.1090204@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E2niel_Fraga?= Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org D=E2niel Fraga wrote: > On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:44:36 -0500 > Anthony Liguori wrote: > > = >> I'm not entirely sure it's the right thing to do. The proper >> solution is qops. >> >> I also don't think it's a good idea to merge things into KVM that = >> wouldn't be reasonable to integrate into upstream QEMU. I think this >> is probably the case with this one. >> = > > Ok, so for someone who wants to compile qemu with gcc4, what's > the solution? You really should use gcc3. You'll have a much better user experience = and honestly it's more useful to have the ability to run -no-kvm to = troubleshoot. Is there a particular reason why gcc3 isn't available to you? Regards, Anthony Liguori > I tried your patch, but it isn't applied correctly. Do > you have an updated version of the patch? > > Thank you. > > = ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DDE= VDEV