From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: kvm repository unification Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:02:08 +0200 Message-ID: <45FFDB50.7050105@qumranet.com> References: <45FFCFD7.5000107@qumranet.com> <45FF8B73.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> <45FFD598.2050403@qumranet.com> <45FF9418.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel To: Gregory Haskins Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45FF9418.BA47.005A.0-Et1tbQHTxzrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Gregory Haskins wrote: > So if you can make the integration with the kernel tree work from a political standpoint, I'd say go for it. > There's really no political issue, as it's completely internal to kvm development. It just seemed wierd and wrong so I thought I'd see if someone has a better idea. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV