From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 09/28] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:23:36 +0200 Message-ID: <45a56110-95e9-e1f3-83ab-e777b48bf79a@redhat.com> References: <147190820782.9523.4967724730957229273.stgit@brijesh-build-machine> <147190832511.9523.10850626471583956499.stgit@brijesh-build-machine> <20160922143545.3kl7khff6vqk7b2t@pd.tnic> <443d06f5-2db5-5107-296f-94fabd209407@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, linus.walleij@linaro.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, aarcange@redhat.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, mchehab@kernel.org, simon.guinot@sequanux.org, bhe@redhat.com, xemul@parallels.com, joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, msalter@redhat.com, ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, labbott@fedoraproject.org, dyoung@redhat.com, jroedel@suse.de, keescook@chromium.org, toshi.kani@hpe.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, kuleshovmail@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, alexandre.bounine To: Tom Lendacky , Borislav Petkov , Brijesh Singh Return-path: In-Reply-To: <443d06f5-2db5-5107-296f-94fabd209407@amd.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 22/09/2016 19:46, Tom Lendacky wrote: >> > Do you mean, it is encrypted here because we're in the guest kernel? > Yes, the idea is that the SEV guest will be running encrypted from the > start, including the BIOS/UEFI, and so all of the EFI related data will > be encrypted. Unless this is part of some spec, it's easier if things are the same in SME and SEV. Paolo