From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] kvm-17 release Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:33:30 +0200 Message-ID: <46039EEA.4070504@qumranet.com> References: <45FFE14F.6020808@qumranet.com> <4602D9D5.7060806@mr511.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel To: Michael Riepe Return-path: In-reply-to: <4602D9D5.7060806-0QoEqw4nQxo@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Michael Riepe wrote: > Hi! > > With respect to the Core Duo, this is the best release I've seen so far: > > - FreeBSD 6.1: works. > - NetBSD 3.1: works. > - OpenSuse 10.2 (sans gfxmenu): works. > - Qemu-Puppy 2.01-3: works. > - Qemu-Puppy 2.13-1: works. > - Solaris 10.1: works. > - XP Pro: works. > > We strive for monotonously increasing quality ;-) thanks for the comprehensive testing. > Unfortunately, Knoppix (both 5.0 and 5.1.1) has stopped working now. I > didn't try 5.2 yet. > 5.1.1 failed for me, but booted fine with nmi_watchdog=0 as a guest kernel parameter. No version of kvm has supported the nmi watchdog, so I don't quite understand what's going on. Which version of kvm did you get 5.1.1 working with? I added the architectural performance monitor counters to the todo. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV