From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Gregory Haskins" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for in-kernel mmio handlers Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:23:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4614B1FE.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> References: <4613C73F.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> <4614A973.6020102@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: "Avi Kivity" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4614A973.6020102-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org >>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2007 at 3:46 AM, in message <4614A973.6020102-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>, Avi Kivity wrote: > > The pit/pic are pio devices, not mmio, so they need their own bus. Good morning! Yeah, I knew that but I haven't coded any support for anything but mmio yet. I explicitly chose the "kvm_io_XX" name instead of kvm_mmio_XXX in hopes that I can use the same structure for a pio_bus object in addition to the existing mmio_bus objects. Since I haven't really spent much time thinking about the pio side yet, im not sure if it will translate or require its own. Thanks for your feedback on the patch. I will make the changes you requested and re-submit (note quite a few of them have been fixed in the follow up email I sent after talking with Chris Wright). Regards, -Greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV