From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: QEMU IRQ abstraction Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 09:00:37 +0300 Message-ID: <46188505.4000004@qumranet.com> References: <46181418.6090302@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: In-reply-to: <46181418.6090302-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > Paul Brook just committed a rather large changeset to abstract all the > IRQ stuff through QEMU. This should make it pretty easy to implement > in-kernel APIC without hacking the i8259 since all of the hardware > emulation now takes a qemu_irq structure. I've taken a look, it's quite good. > > Once it settles down a little, it may be worth sync'ing KVM with QEMU > CVS. > Yes. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV