From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Riepe Subject: Re: kvm somehow exempt from frequency scaling? Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:16:04 +0200 Message-ID: <461B63E4.3080804@mr511.de> References: <87veg6bck6.fsf@grogan.peloton> <4619EB19.20305@qumranet.com> <87mz1gj1pr.fsf@grogan.peloton> <461B3CBB.3040401@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: In-Reply-To: <461B3CBB.3040401-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Hi! Avi Kivity wrote: > Sounds like ondemand is broken. Maybe it only switches when the load rises in user space. With KVM, it appears in system space. Got to cross-check that on my Core Duo. Michael. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV