Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/9] Basic guest virtualdevices infrastructure

Carsten Otte
2007-05-14T13:32:14Z

Dor Laor wrote:
> I think Avi meant using a virtual bus as an option for HVMs too (windows
> especially). Currently we're using the cpi bus. Using a new virtualized
> bus might be a good idea, it's easy & clean for open source. The
> question is it make life easier for HVMs. For instance, on windows we'll
> need Pnp support for these devices.
Oh that way around. Thanks for clarification.
As far as I see, a stable hypercall API would also be good for
maintaining non-GPL HVMs. Probably we should forge the API with
respect to other HVMs needs then.

so long,
Carsten