public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Baruch Even <baruch-6P1Dz+XQpLLYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: /dev/kvm permissions
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:52:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4675830B.3020404@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46758112.4030604-6P1Dz+XQpLLYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>

Baruch Even wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What do peoples do/think about the permissions for /dev/kvm?
>
> I'm the maintainer for the Debian package and currently the package uses 
> a group to control access, for no good reason really. I've seen that 
> kqemu in Debian simply uses 0666 permissions and consider doing the same 
> for kvm. I wanted to know what others do in other distributions and what 
> others think the permissions should be.
>
>   

I recommend 0660, and setting /dev/kvm's group to 'kvm'.  Users which
need access to kvm can be added to that group.

A udev rule which does this is available in the scripts/ directory in
kvm-userspace.git (not sure if it is packaged).

When kvm stops locking so much memory, I guess this can be relaxed.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-17 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-17 18:44 /dev/kvm permissions Baruch Even
     [not found] ` <46758112.4030604-6P1Dz+XQpLLYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
2007-06-17 18:52   ` Avi Kivity [this message]
     [not found]     ` <4675830B.3020404-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-06-17 19:17       ` Baruch Even

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4675830B.3020404@qumranet.com \
    --to=avi-atkuwr5tajbwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=baruch-6P1Dz+XQpLLYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox