From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: APIC patch Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:01:24 -0400 Message-ID: <46812A44.5010109@qumranet.com> References: <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A01AA4EF0@pdsmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: "Dong, Eddie" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A01AA4EF0-wq7ZOvIWXbNpB2pF5aRoyrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Dong, Eddie wrote: > So I have 2 choices: > 1: Port PIC to APIC patch which will use irqdevice abstraction layer and > V09 irq injection path + bug fix mentioned above. > > 2: Port APIC to PIC patch (have above mentioned issue fixed) which > eliminates irqdevice abstraction layer. > We can discuss the abstraction layer in future if we want, but we can > start from simple. > > IMO #2 is a little bit easier from effort point of view, but I am not > sure what is the decision and up to the community. Or if somebody else > are willing to do the merge, I will be very happy to dig other problems. > > We decided on #2 some time ago... why are we rehashing this again? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/