public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] vmx.c uses x86_decode_prefix() instead of	get_io_count().
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:41:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46B1A6B8.7020404@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B1A51C.2040104-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>

Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>> How about just calliing emulate_instruction() from here (just for the
>> string case)?  That will eliminate all the setup code.
>>     
>
> But this setup is in emulate_instruction() so it will be executed anyway.
>
>   

I'm  not worried about run-time overhead, but about the amount of code.

>> x86_emulate_memop() will need to be extended to decode ins/outs, but
>> that's fairly easy.
>>     
>
> X86_decode_prefix() is a subset of instruction decoding part of
> x86_emulate_memop(), kvm_setup_pio() can be seen as a subset of instruction
> emulating part of x86_emulate_memop(). So I think in term of performance it is
> better to do like that, but I agree by doing:
>
> if (string)
> 	return emulate_instruction(vcpu, kvm_run, 0, 0);
> else
> 	return kvm_setup_pio(vcpu, kvm_run, in, size, port);
>
> it is more more ... more simple.
>
> If you prefer simplicity, I can do like that ?
> (but I know you prefer simplicity...)
>
>   

Yes.  Note that x86_emulate_memop() will eventually call kvm_setup_pio() 
to complete the emulation.

> BTW, I think PATCH 1,2 and 3 should be applied anyway because they allow to
> introduce the separation between instruction decoding and instruction emulation
> requested by the TODO "Split the emulator into two functions: one to decode into
> the emulation context, and the other to actually execute the instruction."
>   

I agree.  I'll look into it with more detail.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-02  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-01  9:05 PATCH 0/5] Consolidate the insb/outsb emulation into x86_emulate.c Laurent Vivier
     [not found] ` <46B04CCA.2010503-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2007-08-01  9:09   ` [PATCH 1/5] change ctxt.*_base to an array ctxt.base[X86EMUL_BASE_*] Laurent Vivier
     [not found]     ` <46B04DD6.7010702-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2007-08-01  9:13       ` [PATCH 2/5] group all prefix decoding results in a structure called x86_prefix Laurent Vivier
     [not found]         ` <46B04EB9.5010103-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2007-08-01  9:16           ` [PATCH 3/5] extract prefix decoding part from x86_emulate_memop() to x86_decode_prefix() Laurent Vivier
     [not found]             ` <46B04F56.60607-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2007-08-01  9:19               ` [PATCH 4/5] vmx.c uses x86_decode_prefix() instead of get_io_count() Laurent Vivier
     [not found]                 ` <46B0501C.6060409-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2007-08-01  9:22                   ` [PATCH 5/5] svm.c uses x86_decode_prefix() instead of io_address() and io_get_override() Laurent Vivier
2007-08-02  8:48                   ` [PATCH 4/5] vmx.c uses x86_decode_prefix() instead of get_io_count() Avi Kivity
     [not found]                     ` <46B19A7B.2030109-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-08-02  9:34                       ` Laurent Vivier
     [not found]                         ` <46B1A51C.2040104-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2007-08-02  9:41                           ` Avi Kivity [this message]
     [not found]                             ` <46B1A6B8.7020404-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-08-02 16:46                               ` Laurent Vivier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46B1A6B8.7020404@qumranet.com \
    --to=avi-atkuwr5tajbwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox