Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer infrastrucure - take2

Avi Kivity
2007-08-19T14:07:17Z

Paul Brook wrote:
>> Yes, good thinking, but this should only be done if it actually impacts
>> something. Reducing overhead from 0.1% to 0.05% is not worthwhile if it
>> introduces extra complexity.
>>
>
>
> If the overhead is that small, why are we touching this code in the first
> place?
>

Accuracy is much more important from my point of view. Also, the
reduction in the number of signals delivered when the guest uses 100Hz
is significant.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function