From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer infrastrucure - take2 Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:07:17 +0300 Message-ID: <46C84E95.7070802@qumranet.com> References: <20070817231149.544849769@gmail.com> <20070819131042.GA22798@mail.shareable.org> <46C84A16.7040305@qumranet.com> <200708191457.21237.paul@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Jamie Lokier , qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org To: Paul Brook Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200708191457.21237.paul-qD8j1LwMmJjtCj0u4l0SBw@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Paul Brook wrote: >> Yes, good thinking, but this should only be done if it actually impacts >> something. Reducing overhead from 0.1% to 0.05% is not worthwhile if it >> introduces extra complexity. >> > > > If the overhead is that small, why are we touching this code in the first > place? > Accuracy is much more important from my point of view. Also, the reduction in the number of signals delivered when the guest uses 100Hz is significant. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/