From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: "kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org"
<kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Architecture independence layer - v0
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:12:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46CBFDFD.3090501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello,
these three patches in v0 are be a base for discussion about an architecture
independence layer. It is part of an internal prototype we use to access
the code
of our port as we develop it currently.
I know that a lot of things in the patches are still needing refining and
polishing, but it is enough to start the discussion about the basic
mechanism
before I (or someone else) spend to much work working on such a layer.
The idea is, that x86 should always work however we split kvm internally to
generic/arch. The split in the current patches is done by gut feeling
and will
improve by a) reviewing some functions more in detail, b) along the
development
of our arch port and c) by your comments.
I know that the current kvm userspace is still very x86 centric and this
will
(has to) change in the future, but we need an architecture mapping now
to develop
our arch code. It should be adaptable to any userspace interface change
that is coming.
Basics I used:
- Since architecture will not change at runtime I do not use a arch_ops
structure
- Instead I used a hidden Kconfig value specifying the kvm architecture
which then
influence the make file to link together the generic and the arch
specific part
to one kvm module
- I split the code into kvm_main.c (generic) and kvm_x86.h/kvm_x86.c
(arch portion)
- A new header kvm_arch.h specifies the interface the architecture has
to implement
- The ioctl interfaces are implemented by the generic kvm_main.c in
three ways
a) a completely generic function is covered by kvm_main.c completely
b) a completely arch dependent function is not covered in kvm_main.c -
at the end
each ioctl goes to a architecture mapping doing the rest of the ioctl
not handled
in the generic part e.g. in kvm_vcpu_ioctl:
default:
r = kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(filp, ioctl, arg);
}
c) functions that have a significant amount of shared code are
implemented by
kvm_main.c using kvm_arch_* to implement the arch specific part.
Either by just
mapping the old *_ioctl_whatever to *_arch_whatever or by moving some
more of the
code out of the arch function up to the generic portion e.g.:
case KVM_RUN:
r = -EINVAL;
if (arg)
goto out;
r = kvm_arch_vcpu_run(vcpu, vcpu->run);
break;
- there is still a lot of potential to move code up and down along these
split, but
thats it so far. I strive to improve that patch series until we are
happy with it
The patch compiles and works without issues on my Opteron based machine
here,
unfortunately I have no Intel base HW to test.
I look forward to every comment. Even if this approach may not be what
we want in
the end, at least it starts the discussion how to do it :-)
Grüsse / Regards
Christian Ehrhardt
P.S. Still a todo and not (yet) covered in this patch proposal is the
arch splitting of structures like vcpu to a generic and an arch part.
--
Christian Ehrhardt
IBM Linux Technology Center, Open Virtualization
+49 7031/16-3385
Ehrhardt-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Ehrhardt-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Johann Weihen
Geschäftsführung: Herbert Kircher
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
next reply other threads:[~2007-08-22 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-22 9:12 Christian Ehrhardt [this message]
[not found] ` <46CBFDFD.3090501-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2007-08-22 9:32 ` [PATCH 0/3] Architecture independence layer - v0 Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46CBFDFD.3090501@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ehrhardt-23vcf4htsmix0ybbhkvfkdbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox