Re: KVM & VMX root mode

[Sander van Leeuwen <sandervl-2taLTamkYL2ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1142 bytes --]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Sander van Leeuwen wrote:
>   
>> You are mistaken. VT-x allows multiple clients to work concurrently.
>> There's only one catch: all those
>> clients should follow certain guidelines.
>>     
>
> Currently, kvm assumes that it is the only user that issues vmptrld
> instructions.  There may me other such assumptions in the code.
>
> There is also the question of who issues the vmxon/vmxoff instructions
> and set the magic msr bits that enable kvm.  You can't have two
> hypervisors doing that; that would be racy.  It should be possible to
> abstract those bits out to something outside kvm, but I don't see that
> happening.
>
>   
VirtualBox currently always executes vmxon when it wants to execute some 
guest code. When leaving
ring 0 it issues the corresponding vmxoff. While that may increase world 
switch overhead, it has not turned
out to be an issue for us. I think it's a bit risky to use somebody 
else's vmxon pointer.

You have a point with the msr updates though.


-- 
Kind regards / mit freundlichen Gruessen / Met vriendelijke groet
  Sander van Leeuwen

innoTek GmbH
http://www.innotek.de
Germany 


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1680 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 315 bytes --]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel