From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] kvm-lite: "The Unbearable Liteness" Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:08:34 +0300 Message-ID: <46DEE292.3040101@qumranet.com> References: <1189005567.10802.127.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1189005638.10802.129.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1189005692.10802.132.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1189006973.10802.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1189007276.26647.7.camel@squirrel> <1189008968.10802.154.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1189009300.28995.7.camel@squirrel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1189009300.28995.7.camel@squirrel> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> Agreed, but that didn't exist when this patch was made. >> >> ISTR there was some feedback for your patches; were you going to repost? >> > > Avi had suggested that IO delay be set based on query to the kernel but > ATM since no devices are in the kernel, this didn't seem like a good > idea. > I think it was passthrough devices; in-kernel devices don't need I/O delay. > Was there something else that I'm missing? > It's just me backlogged. Note that I am only applying fixes to regressions until lapic is merged. Once kernel summit is over I'll get that done. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/