From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: virtio & hypercall interface? Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:21:36 -0500 Message-ID: <46E98DC0.3050509@us.ibm.com> References: <1189664514.32322.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel To: Rusty Russell Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1189664514.32322.14.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Rusty Russell wrote: > Hi all, > > I've finally started looking at Dor's git tree, and it struck me that > it conflicts with Anthony's hypercall patches. FWIW I like Anthony's > patching thing, and don't really care about arg order. Are you trying to implement cpuid in assembly in the monitor? Otherwise, I don't see why arg order would matter. Regards, Anthony Liguori > It'd be nice if > we could pull in the same direction tho 8) > > Thanks, > Rusty. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/