Test result for KVM, kernel 62d1ea7.. , userspace 667f2deff8..

Test result for KVM, kernel 62d1ea7.. , userspace 667f2deff8..

[Zhao, Yunfeng]

Hi, all,
This is today's KVM test result against kvm.git
62d1ea7fdcdb905072198e4cec8f724c8ad33092 and kvm-userspace.git
667f2deff8cea6327f0c832afea2f4952b8f199e.

In today's testing, smp windows still couldn't be booted up.

1 issue is closed
================================================
1. save/restore 64-bit linux guest fails
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1799590&group_
id=180599&atid=893831
This issue should be invalid, the command to test sare/restore missed a
parameter.

Old issues:
================================================
1. 64bit guest with >1.5GBmem cannot start network
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1792984&group_
id=180599&atid=893831

2. Cannot boot win2k guest
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1768187&gro
up_id=180599

3. Network issue of 64bit linux guest
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1796939&group_
id=180599&atid=893831

4. blue screen while install 64bit vista
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1796941&gro
up_id=180599

5. Create multiple guests simultaneously or create one guest many times
may fail 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1741312&group_
id=180599&atid=893831 

6. Can not boot IA32e RHEL 4u3 guest with -no-acpi
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1741314&group_
id=180599&atid=893831 

7. Some ltp test cases fail
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1741316&group_
id=180599&atid=893831 

8. Linux guest crash without nolapic, 2.6.22 kernel.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1769884&gro
up_id=180599 

9. Cannot boot smp windows guests
SMP XP windows guest will hang
SMP win2k guest will turn black
SMP 2003 windows reports driver error.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1799596&group_
id=180599&atid=893831

Thanks
Yunfeng

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Re: Test result for KVM, kernel 62d1ea7.. , userspace 667f2deff8..

[Farkas Levente]

hi,
it seems we've got a real tester:-) for ma all of the bellow are serious
bugs (tomorrow i'll try to send more detail of our host crash too) and
imho the latest 'stable' version was kvm-36. wouldn't be better to
postpone all patches and infrastructure changes (virtio and others)
until these have been fixed and try to produce a new 'stable' release?
i understand then everybody (including myself) would like to see these
new features in the latest and greatest kvm release, but at the same
time i'd be nice to think about the end users too.
may some version cane be labeled as stable (eg 36) and the latest as
devel. this can help a lot for those who are not read this list.

Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> Hi, all,
> This is today's KVM test result against kvm.git
> 62d1ea7fdcdb905072198e4cec8f724c8ad33092 and kvm-userspace.git
> 667f2deff8cea6327f0c832afea2f4952b8f199e.
> 
> In today's testing, smp windows still couldn't be booted up.
> 
> 1 issue is closed
> ================================================
> 1. save/restore 64-bit linux guest fails
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1799590&group_
> id=180599&atid=893831
> This issue should be invalid, the command to test sare/restore missed a
> parameter.
> 
> Old issues:
> ================================================
> 1. 64bit guest with >1.5GBmem cannot start network
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1792984&group_
> id=180599&atid=893831
> 
> 2. Cannot boot win2k guest
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1768187&gro
> up_id=180599
> 
> 3. Network issue of 64bit linux guest
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1796939&group_
> id=180599&atid=893831
> 
> 4. blue screen while install 64bit vista
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1796941&gro
> up_id=180599
> 
> 5. Create multiple guests simultaneously or create one guest many times
> may fail 
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1741312&group_
> id=180599&atid=893831 
> 
> 6. Can not boot IA32e RHEL 4u3 guest with -no-acpi
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1741314&group_
> id=180599&atid=893831 
> 
> 7. Some ltp test cases fail
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1741316&group_
> id=180599&atid=893831 
> 
> 8. Linux guest crash without nolapic, 2.6.22 kernel.
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1769884&gro
> up_id=180599 
> 
> 9. Cannot boot smp windows guests
> SMP XP windows guest will hang
> SMP win2k guest will turn black
> SMP 2003 windows reports driver error.
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1799596&group_
> id=180599&atid=893831
> 
> Thanks
> Yunfeng
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> kvm-devel mailing list
> kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
> 


-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Re: Test result for KVM, kernel 62d1ea7.. , userspace 667f2deff8..

[Avi Kivity]

Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> it seems we've got a real tester:-) for ma all of the bellow are serious
> bugs (tomorrow i'll try to send more detail of our host crash too) and
> imho the latest 'stable' version was kvm-36. wouldn't be better to
> postpone all patches and infrastructure changes (virtio and others)
> until these have been fixed and try to produce a new 'stable' release?
> i understand then everybody (including myself) would like to see these
> new features in the latest and greatest kvm release, but at the same
> time i'd be nice to think about the end users too.
> may some version cane be labeled as stable (eg 36) and the latest as
> devel. this can help a lot for those who are not read this list.
>   

You can use -no-kvm-irqchip to get stability similar to kvm-36.

Stopping vitrio development will not get the other issues fixed.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Re: Test result for KVM, kernel 62d1ea7.. , userspace 667f2deff8..

[Laurent Vivier]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1120 bytes --]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Farkas Levente wrote:
>> hi,
>> it seems we've got a real tester:-) for ma all of the bellow are serious
>> bugs (tomorrow i'll try to send more detail of our host crash too) and
>> imho the latest 'stable' version was kvm-36. wouldn't be better to
>> postpone all patches and infrastructure changes (virtio and others)
>> until these have been fixed and try to produce a new 'stable' release?
>> i understand then everybody (including myself) would like to see these
>> new features in the latest and greatest kvm release, but at the same
>> time i'd be nice to think about the end users too.
>> may some version cane be labeled as stable (eg 36) and the latest as
>> devel. this can help a lot for those who are not read this list.
>>   
> 
> You can use -no-kvm-irqchip to get stability similar to kvm-36.
>

Perhaps a workaround for end user could be to disable by default kvm irqchip and
add an option to enable it (--use-kvm-irqchip) ?

Laurent
-- 
------------- Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org  --------------
          "Software is hard" - Donald Knuth


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 228 bytes --]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Re: Test result for KVM, kernel 62d1ea7.. , userspace 667f2deff8..

[Avi Kivity]

Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> Farkas Levente wrote:
>>     
>>> hi,
>>> it seems we've got a real tester:-) for ma all of the bellow are serious
>>> bugs (tomorrow i'll try to send more detail of our host crash too) and
>>> imho the latest 'stable' version was kvm-36. wouldn't be better to
>>> postpone all patches and infrastructure changes (virtio and others)
>>> until these have been fixed and try to produce a new 'stable' release?
>>> i understand then everybody (including myself) would like to see these
>>> new features in the latest and greatest kvm release, but at the same
>>> time i'd be nice to think about the end users too.
>>> may some version cane be labeled as stable (eg 36) and the latest as
>>> devel. this can help a lot for those who are not read this list.
>>>   
>>>       
>> You can use -no-kvm-irqchip to get stability similar to kvm-36.
>>
>>     
>
> Perhaps a workaround for end user could be to disable by default kvm irqchip and
> add an option to enable it (--use-kvm-irqchip) ?
>
>   

I thought of it, but that would mean we wouldn't see the problems, so 
they wouldn't get fixed.



-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Re: Test result for KVM, kernel 62d1ea7.. , userspace 667f2deff8..

[Laurent Vivier]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1468 bytes --]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>  
>>> Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>    
>>>> hi,
>>>> it seems we've got a real tester:-) for ma all of the bellow are
>>>> serious
>>>> bugs (tomorrow i'll try to send more detail of our host crash too) and
>>>> imho the latest 'stable' version was kvm-36. wouldn't be better to
>>>> postpone all patches and infrastructure changes (virtio and others)
>>>> until these have been fixed and try to produce a new 'stable' release?
>>>> i understand then everybody (including myself) would like to see these
>>>> new features in the latest and greatest kvm release, but at the same
>>>> time i'd be nice to think about the end users too.
>>>> may some version cane be labeled as stable (eg 36) and the latest as
>>>> devel. this can help a lot for those who are not read this list.
>>>>         
>>> You can use -no-kvm-irqchip to get stability similar to kvm-36.
>>>
>>>     
>>
>> Perhaps a workaround for end user could be to disable by default kvm
>> irqchip and
>> add an option to enable it (--use-kvm-irqchip) ?
>>
>>   
> 
> I thought of it, but that would mean we wouldn't see the problems, so
> they wouldn't get fixed.

I agree: enabling by default development features allows you to have more bug
feedbacks. It's a choice...

Laurent
-- 
------------- Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org  --------------
          "Software is hard" - Donald Knuth


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 228 bytes --]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel