From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Test result for KVM, kernel 62d1ea7.. , userspace 667f2deff8.. Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:07:34 +0200 Message-ID: <46F7B696.1030304@qumranet.com> References: <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02125EEE@pdsmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com> <46F7AC42.9080909@bppiac.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Farkas Levente Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46F7AC42.9080909-lWVWdrzSO4GHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Farkas Levente wrote: > hi, > it seems we've got a real tester:-) for ma all of the bellow are serious > bugs (tomorrow i'll try to send more detail of our host crash too) and > imho the latest 'stable' version was kvm-36. wouldn't be better to > postpone all patches and infrastructure changes (virtio and others) > until these have been fixed and try to produce a new 'stable' release? > i understand then everybody (including myself) would like to see these > new features in the latest and greatest kvm release, but at the same > time i'd be nice to think about the end users too. > may some version cane be labeled as stable (eg 36) and the latest as > devel. this can help a lot for those who are not read this list. > You can use -no-kvm-irqchip to get stability similar to kvm-36. Stopping vitrio development will not get the other issues fixed. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/