Re: Test result for KVM, kernel 62d1ea7.. , userspace 667f2deff8..

[Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1120 bytes --]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Farkas Levente wrote:
>> hi,
>> it seems we've got a real tester:-) for ma all of the bellow are serious
>> bugs (tomorrow i'll try to send more detail of our host crash too) and
>> imho the latest 'stable' version was kvm-36. wouldn't be better to
>> postpone all patches and infrastructure changes (virtio and others)
>> until these have been fixed and try to produce a new 'stable' release?
>> i understand then everybody (including myself) would like to see these
>> new features in the latest and greatest kvm release, but at the same
>> time i'd be nice to think about the end users too.
>> may some version cane be labeled as stable (eg 36) and the latest as
>> devel. this can help a lot for those who are not read this list.
>>   
> 
> You can use -no-kvm-irqchip to get stability similar to kvm-36.
>

Perhaps a workaround for end user could be to disable by default kvm irqchip and
add an option to enable it (--use-kvm-irqchip) ?

Laurent
-- 
------------- Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org  --------------
          "Software is hard" - Donald Knuth


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 228 bytes --]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel