From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Test result for KVM, kernel 62d1ea7.. , userspace 667f2deff8.. Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:00:50 +0200 Message-ID: <46F7C312.4040103@qumranet.com> References: <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02125EEE@pdsmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com> <46F7AC42.9080909@bppiac.hu> <46F7B696.1030304@qumranet.com> <46F7C240.1030501@bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Laurent Vivier Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46F7C240.1030501-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Laurent Vivier wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Farkas Levente wrote: >> >>> hi, >>> it seems we've got a real tester:-) for ma all of the bellow are serious >>> bugs (tomorrow i'll try to send more detail of our host crash too) and >>> imho the latest 'stable' version was kvm-36. wouldn't be better to >>> postpone all patches and infrastructure changes (virtio and others) >>> until these have been fixed and try to produce a new 'stable' release? >>> i understand then everybody (including myself) would like to see these >>> new features in the latest and greatest kvm release, but at the same >>> time i'd be nice to think about the end users too. >>> may some version cane be labeled as stable (eg 36) and the latest as >>> devel. this can help a lot for those who are not read this list. >>> >>> >> You can use -no-kvm-irqchip to get stability similar to kvm-36. >> >> > > Perhaps a workaround for end user could be to disable by default kvm irqchip and > add an option to enable it (--use-kvm-irqchip) ? > > I thought of it, but that would mean we wouldn't see the problems, so they wouldn't get fixed. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/