Re: Test result for KVM, kernel 62d1ea7.. , userspace 667f2deff8..

Avi Kivity
2007-09-24T13:07:34Z

Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> it seems we've got a real tester:-) for ma all of the bellow are serious
> bugs (tomorrow i'll try to send more detail of our host crash too) and
> imho the latest 'stable' version was kvm-36. wouldn't be better to
> postpone all patches and infrastructure changes (virtio and others)
> until these have been fixed and try to produce a new 'stable' release?
> i understand then everybody (including myself) would like to see these
> new features in the latest and greatest kvm release, but at the same
> time i'd be nice to think about the end users too.
> may some version cane be labeled as stable (eg 36) and the latest as
> devel. this can help a lot for those who are not read this list.
>

You can use -no-kvm-irqchip to get stability similar to kvm-36.

Stopping vitrio development will not get the other issues fixed.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function