From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Farkas Levente Subject: Re: FYI: fixing Vista networking with rtl8139 + KVM Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:08:46 +0200 Message-ID: <46FB731E.8000907@bppiac.hu> References: <20070927031945.GL29729@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070927031945.GL29729-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > A Fedora user reported that Vista networking isn't working with KVM[1] and > pointed to the Wiki > > http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Vista_Networking_Workaround > > FYI, a patch from Xen was merged into upstream QEMU to fix this problem > with rtl8139 a week or two back and works nicely with KVM+Vista... > > http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org/msg11365.html > > ..avoiding need for messing around with ne2k drivers as mentioned in the wiki > > Regards, > Dan. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308201 does this means that in general use the ne2k driver is a better choice? anyway is there a suggested network driver for the guests? -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/