public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FYI: fixing Vista networking with rtl8139 + KVM
@ 2007-09-27  3:19 Daniel P. Berrange
       [not found] ` <20070927031945.GL29729-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel P. Berrange @ 2007-09-27  3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

A Fedora user reported that Vista networking isn't working with KVM[1] and
pointed to the Wiki

  http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Vista_Networking_Workaround

FYI, a patch from Xen was merged into upstream QEMU to fix this problem
with rtl8139 a week or two back and works nicely with KVM+Vista...

   http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org/msg11365.html

..avoiding need for messing around with ne2k drivers as mentioned in the wiki

Regards,
Dan.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308201
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: FYI: fixing Vista networking with rtl8139 + KVM
       [not found] ` <20070927031945.GL29729-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2007-09-27  9:08   ` Farkas Levente
       [not found]     ` <46FB731E.8000907-lWVWdrzSO4GHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Farkas Levente @ 2007-09-27  9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel P. Berrange; +Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> A Fedora user reported that Vista networking isn't working with KVM[1] and
> pointed to the Wiki
> 
>   http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Vista_Networking_Workaround
> 
> FYI, a patch from Xen was merged into upstream QEMU to fix this problem
> with rtl8139 a week or two back and works nicely with KVM+Vista...
> 
>    http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org/msg11365.html
> 
> ..avoiding need for messing around with ne2k drivers as mentioned in the wiki
> 
> Regards,
> Dan.
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308201

does this means that in general use the ne2k driver is a better choice?
anyway is there a suggested network driver for the guests?

-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: FYI: fixing Vista networking with rtl8139 + KVM
       [not found]     ` <46FB731E.8000907-lWVWdrzSO4GHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2007-09-27  9:38       ` Avi Kivity
       [not found]         ` <46FB7A0E.3080801-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
  2007-09-27 13:43       ` Daniel P. Berrange
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2007-09-27  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Farkas Levente; +Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

Farkas Levente wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>   
>> A Fedora user reported that Vista networking isn't working with KVM[1] and
>> pointed to the Wiki
>>
>>   http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Vista_Networking_Workaround
>>
>> FYI, a patch from Xen was merged into upstream QEMU to fix this problem
>> with rtl8139 a week or two back and works nicely with KVM+Vista...
>>
>>    http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org/msg11365.html
>>
>> ..avoiding need for messing around with ne2k drivers as mentioned in the wiki
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dan.
>>
>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308201
>>     
>
> does this means that in general use the ne2k driver is a better choice?
> anyway is there a suggested network driver for the guests?
>
>   

No, it means I need to merge qemu-cvs.

rtl8139 performs faster than ne2000.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: FYI: fixing Vista networking with rtl8139 + KVM
       [not found]         ` <46FB7A0E.3080801-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
@ 2007-09-27  9:41           ` Laurent Vivier
       [not found]             ` <46FB7AB0.20301-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Vivier @ 2007-09-27  9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Avi Kivity; +Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1167 bytes --]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Farkas Levente wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>   
>>> A Fedora user reported that Vista networking isn't working with KVM[1] and
>>> pointed to the Wiki
>>>
>>>   http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Vista_Networking_Workaround
>>>
>>> FYI, a patch from Xen was merged into upstream QEMU to fix this problem
>>> with rtl8139 a week or two back and works nicely with KVM+Vista...
>>>
>>>    http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org/msg11365.html
>>>
>>> ..avoiding need for messing around with ne2k drivers as mentioned in the wiki
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dan.
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308201
>>>     
>> does this means that in general use the ne2k driver is a better choice?
>> anyway is there a suggested network driver for the guests?
>>
>>   
> 
> No, it means I need to merge qemu-cvs.
> 
> rtl8139 performs faster than ne2000.

But adding CRC computing in RTL839 should have some impacts on performance.

Laurent
-- 
------------- Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org  --------------
          "Software is hard" - Donald Knuth


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 228 bytes --]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: FYI: fixing Vista networking with rtl8139 + KVM
       [not found]             ` <46FB7AB0.20301-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
@ 2007-09-27  9:56               ` Avi Kivity
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2007-09-27  9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Vivier; +Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> Farkas Levente wrote:
>>     
>>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> A Fedora user reported that Vista networking isn't working with KVM[1] and
>>>> pointed to the Wiki
>>>>
>>>>   http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Vista_Networking_Workaround
>>>>
>>>> FYI, a patch from Xen was merged into upstream QEMU to fix this problem
>>>> with rtl8139 a week or two back and works nicely with KVM+Vista...
>>>>
>>>>    http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org/msg11365.html
>>>>
>>>> ..avoiding need for messing around with ne2k drivers as mentioned in the wiki
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dan.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308201
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> does this means that in general use the ne2k driver is a better choice?
>>> anyway is there a suggested network driver for the guests?
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> No, it means I need to merge qemu-cvs.
>>
>> rtl8139 performs faster than ne2000.
>>     
>
> But adding CRC computing in RTL839 should have some impacts on performance.
>
>   

It's probably negligible since the copy has placed the packet in the cache.


-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: FYI: fixing Vista networking with rtl8139 + KVM
       [not found]     ` <46FB731E.8000907-lWVWdrzSO4GHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
  2007-09-27  9:38       ` Avi Kivity
@ 2007-09-27 13:43       ` Daniel P. Berrange
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel P. Berrange @ 2007-09-27 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Farkas Levente; +Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > A Fedora user reported that Vista networking isn't working with KVM[1] and
> > pointed to the Wiki
> > 
> >   http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Vista_Networking_Workaround
> > 
> > FYI, a patch from Xen was merged into upstream QEMU to fix this problem
> > with rtl8139 a week or two back and works nicely with KVM+Vista...
> > 
> >    http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org/msg11365.html
> > 
> > ..avoiding need for messing around with ne2k drivers as mentioned in the wiki
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Dan.
> > 
> > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308201
> 
> does this means that in general use the ne2k driver is a better choice?

No, ne2k is an awful choice. It has worse performance than rtl8139 and does
not do link state reporting so things like network manager won't be able to
automatically configure the NIC in a guest. rtl8139 is the preferred choice
and in Fedora we have patched Xen, QEMU & KVM so they use rtl8139 by default

Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-27 13:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-27  3:19 FYI: fixing Vista networking with rtl8139 + KVM Daniel P. Berrange
     [not found] ` <20070927031945.GL29729-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-09-27  9:08   ` Farkas Levente
     [not found]     ` <46FB731E.8000907-lWVWdrzSO4GHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
2007-09-27  9:38       ` Avi Kivity
     [not found]         ` <46FB7A0E.3080801-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-09-27  9:41           ` Laurent Vivier
     [not found]             ` <46FB7AB0.20301-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2007-09-27  9:56               ` Avi Kivity
2007-09-27 13:43       ` Daniel P. Berrange

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox