From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dor Laor Subject: Re: when to relize the Paravirtualized networking ? Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:18:23 +0200 Message-ID: <4702D1BF.1040109@qumranet.com> References: Reply-To: dor.laor-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2059950598==" Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: vast yellow Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============2059950598== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030508030308040400050409" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030508030308040400050409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit vast yellow wrote: > > Anyone know when to release include the following features > > # Paravirtualized networking I have such a code in a separate git repository. It is not yet production ready. The next release is a rebase of Rusty code for virtio and some KVM/Qemu backend. It probably be ready in few weeks. > # Paravirtualized block device The effort is not big since Rusty has paved most of the way. Some qemu block handling needs to be done. Again it can happen in 1-2 months. > KVM Tap network is slower than Xen. Can we optimize it? > Are you talking about PV driver or fully virtualized nic? Dor. --------------030508030308040400050409 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit vast yellow wrote:

Anyone know when to release include the following features

  • Paravirtualized networking
    • I have such a code in a separate git repository. It is not yet production ready.
    The next release is a rebase of Rusty code for virtio and some KVM/Qemu backend.
    It probably be ready in few weeks.
  • Paravirtualized block device
    • The effort is not big since Rusty has paved most of the way.
    Some qemu block handling needs to be done. Again it can happen in 1-2 months.
    KVM Tap network is slower than Xen. Can we optimize it?
     
    Are you talking about PV driver or fully virtualized nic?
    Dor.
    --------------030508030308040400050409-- --===============2059950598== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ --===============2059950598== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel --===============2059950598==--