From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Allow memory to be specified in kvmctl Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:09:19 -0500 Message-ID: <470BFC0F.5040707@us.ibm.com> References: <11919655141141-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <11919655153228-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <20071009215449.GM4335@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Jerone Young , Avi Kivity To: Muli Ben-Yehuda Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071009215449.GM4335-WD1JZD8MxeCTrf4lBMg6DdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: >> while ((ch = getopt_long(argc, argv, sopts, lopts, &opt_ind)) != -1) { >> switch (ch) { >> @@ -367,6 +372,24 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) >> case 'p': >> enter_protected_mode = true; >> break; >> + case 'm': >> + memory_size = strtoull(optarg, &endptr, 0); >> + switch (*endptr) { >> + case 'G': case 'g': >> + memory_size <<= 10; >> + case '\0': >> + case 'M': case 'm': >> + memory_size <<= 10; >> + case 'K': case 'k': >> + memory_size <<= 10; >> + break; >> > > Cute trick with the fall-through and shifts... not quite Duff's > device, but cute. Please consider adding a /* fallthrough */ comment > to make it obvious. > I'll make it more clear and send out the series again tomorrow when others have gotten a chance to review. >> + default: >> + fprintf(stderr, >> + "Unrecongized memory suffix: %c\n", >> + *endptr); >> + exit(1); >> + } >> + break; >> > > How about adding a sanity check that memory_size makes sense here > rather than having kvm_create() fail obscurely? For example if the > user got the memory size wrong for some reason we'll end up with > memory_size = 0 here. > There's an exit(1) and it's using stroull() so the only way that memory_size could equal 0 is if the user specified --memory=0. I'm not sure I agree it's worth checking for that sort of circumstance, perhaps the user had a reason for doing it? Regards, Anthony Liguori > Cheers, > Muli > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/