From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up MMU functions to take struct kvm when appropriate Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:27:13 -0500 Message-ID: <470D6DE1.3060902@us.ibm.com> References: <11920621643330-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity To: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <11920621643330-git-send-email-aliguori-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > Some of the MMU functions take a struct kvm_vcpu even though they effect all > VCPUs. This patch cleans up some of them to instead take a struct kvm. This > makes things a bit more clear. > > The main thing that was confusing me was whether certain functions need to be > called on all VCPUs. > > Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori > Please ignore this version of the patch. It breaks the build b/c I forgot to guilt refresh before sending. v2 is the right version of the patch to apply which should already be on the list. Sorry for the noise. Regards, Anthony Liguori ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/