From: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] [0/3] Patches to support new architectures.
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:01:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <470E1E96.4040601@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC7AEE24-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>
>>> 2. kvm_x86_ops-kvm_ops.patch. In order to adapt different
>>> architectures, we have to change it to an neutral name. kvm_ops maybe
>>> not the best name, but shouldn't introduce different meanings. In the
>>> third patch, we add a sub field struct kvm_arch_ops for arch-specific
>>> ops. That is, different CPU archs can define its arch-specific
>>> ops for its special need. IMO, we should treat x86, IA64, ppc etc as
>>> different archtiectures, other than see vmx, svm as different archs.
>>> svm and vmx should be two different virtualization approaches for
>>> x86 arch from the point view of platforms.
>>>
>>>
>> ia64, ppc, and s390 don't need to select an implementation at runtime
>> (since each have just one instruction set) so they don't need function
>> pointers. Instead we should use linkage (different functions for each
>> arch, but with the same names). Kbuild will select the right files to
>> compile depending on arch.
>>
>
> For x86 side, how to handle the co-existence of vmx and svm ? For
> example, in a release linux kernel which supports KVM, how to know it
> will be installed to Intel or AMD platforms ? If we determin it in
> advance, we have to compile them all in at one time, but it maybe
> difficult for current
> kvm code to implement.
>
x86 will continue to use kvm_x86_ops for that purposes. But other archs
should not.
x86 will use both mechanisms: first, linkage will select the x86
function, and then kvm_x86_ops will be used to select the implementation
dependent code. The two levels are very different as kvm_x86_ops is
very low level and x86 specific.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-11 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-11 9:08 [Patch] [0/3] Patches to support new architectures Zhang, Xiantao
[not found] ` <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC7AEDD6-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-11 9:26 ` Carsten Otte
[not found] ` <470DEC63.1030004-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-11 9:39 ` Zhang, Xiantao
2007-10-11 11:14 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <470E0599.40102-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-11 12:56 ` Zhang, Xiantao
[not found] ` <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC7AEE24-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-11 13:01 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
[not found] ` <470E1E96.4040601-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-12 1:57 ` Zhang, Xiantao
[not found] ` <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC7AEEFB-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-12 6:36 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <470F15D7.7080205-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-12 6:40 ` Zhang, Xiantao
[not found] ` <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC808CB3-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-12 8:34 ` Carsten Otte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=470E1E96.4040601@qumranet.com \
--to=avi-atkuwr5tajbwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xiantao.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox