Re: RFC/patch portability: split kvm_vcpu_ioctl v1

[Carsten Otte <cotte-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Applied, thanks.  I renamed kvm_vcpu_load() and kvm_vcpu_put() back to 
> vcpu_load() and vcpu_put() in order to keep the patch small and simple, 
> and because I'm emotionally attached to the original names.
Oh, I think I had a very good reason for renaming it: it's no longer 
static, and thus part of the kernel's global namespace in case kvm is 
built-in. As far as I know, modules are expected to prefix any symbol 
they use with their module name.
I am sorry for the emotional part of it, I tend to stick to old names 
too once I got used to them.
In case you decide you want kvm_vcpu_load/put again, let me know so 
that I can supply a patch on top of git that renames it.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/