Re: [RFC] Paravirt timer for KVM

Avi Kivity
2007-10-16T09:47:39Z

Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> I think I'll stick to two fields then, with u64 for seconds and nanoseconds.
> Or would it just be better to use a u64 nanoseconds field?
>
> A _lot_ of time should have passed before such counter overflows. So
> having two is possibly overkill

u64 nanoseconds looks good to me.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function