From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] move kvm_guest_exit() after local_irq_enable() Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:32:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4717607A.8070304@qumranet.com> References: <47135D1B.1060004@bull.net> <11927135412363-git-send-email-Laurent.Vivier@bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Laurent Vivier Return-path: In-Reply-To: <11927135412363-git-send-email-Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Laurent Vivier wrote: > According comments from Avi, we can clear PF_VCPU in kvm_guest_exit if we move > it after local_irq_enable(). > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/15/114 > > To simplify s390 port, we don't clear it in account_system_time(). > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/15/183 > Applied (the kvm part), and added a fat comment on the barrier. Can you send a signed-off-by: line? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/