From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] move kvm_guest_exit() after	local_irq_enable()
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:49:13 +0200
Message-ID: <47176459.1030302@bull.net>
References: <47135D1B.1060004@bull.net>	<11927135412363-git-send-email-Laurent.Vivier@bull.net> <4717607A.8070304@qumranet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S933024AbXJRNuf@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4717607A.8070304@qumranet.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Avi Kivity a =E9crit :
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> According comments from Avi, we can clear PF_VCPU in kvm_guest_exit =
if we move
>> it after local_irq_enable().
>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/15/114
>>
>> To simplify s390 port, we don't clear it in account_system_time().
>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/15/183
>>  =20
>=20
> Applied (the kvm part), and added a fat comment on the barrier.  Can =
you=20
> send a signed-off-by: line?
>=20

Sorry, I missed it...

Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>